Ads 468x60px

Selasa, 18 Oktober 2011

Objectives of the program against the grant of the State

One of the "effects of the situation in Indonesia in the (internal)" contained in the opening paragraph-IV, 1945 Constitution, which says:. Paragraph "promote the general welfare .. While connected with the provisions of Article 33 (2) and (3) of the Constitution of 1945 confirms the dominance of natural resources (SDA) in Indonesia by the state monopoly is clearly a form of State / Government of the natural resources that exist in Indonesia.

Therefore, on this basis the "subsidy" for the basic needs of the population is clearly a logical consequence of the monopoly of natural resources is the state. If subsidies to basic needs of people, without exception, abolished / waiver, then it is a betrayal of our country's goal of "promoting the general welfare."

All questions, whether people should be granted and rely on government subsidies?

This question, of course, people should not depend on government subsidies, but regardless of the ideals that "subsidy" from the government for any reason should not be written off / waiver, because as mentioned above is a consequence the state monopoly in the SDA.

Can you imagine if people had the right from the beginning of the independence of Indonesia to the authority or control over the management of natural resources since the days of the old order (Orla), the New Order period (New Order) to now, people had enough time to take advantage of the opportunity to develop natural resources in the business community and destiny did not collapse, as now, people suffering from absolute poverty tend to be poor.

Countries for other purposes listed in the opening 1945 of Aline IV is "the intellectual life of the nation" is a form of government responsibilities in the improvement of human resources (HR), so that people can improve their welfare, which in time will not necessarily depend on the contributions made by the government, even if the subsidy should still be given, but people certainly do not oppose the grant is set more demanding.

In the era of globalization, which emphasizes the life of a market economy in which growth is on the left and the economic welfare of the people completely free market mechanism, the situation is clearly the country / people of Indonesia were not willing to follow, because in addition to the SDA in Indonesia and was largely controlled by kavitalis (investors) and most of the industries that dominate the lives of people is controlled by foreigners, making it harder for the government to restore the position of current direction, as defined in Article 33, paragraph (2) which states that "the industries is important for control of the country and the welfare of the majority state-controlled ".

And for the scholarship program for the basic needs of the population, including fuel supplied to the affected people are always, as government revenues, in addition to relying on market economics associated with the types of taxes and taxes imposed directly by the people and companies also benefit from the life, whose number can not be said to be more important because the state sector are few, and is due to the large companies in Indonesia are in their mostly owned by foreign companies or foreign investors.

In conclusion, the subsidy will always be disturbed people and government policies that are always trying to reduce and eliminate subsidies clearly contrary to the purposes of the State mentioned in paragraph IV of the Constitution of 1945.

Senin, 10 Oktober 2011

Thus, the law Yusril Ihza power until Gumilang

Former Mensesneg Yusril Ihza Mahendra Gumilang until the family called a power law Ponpes leader of al-Zeitun Indramayu. Yusril approach in the air to get in case of default of a forged letter.

"I have since yesterday, so its appropriate powers. Family came to me and let me see if lawyers in the air to deal with Pak. Before that (they) all show Pak Ali Cape, but they seem more focused Pak Ali Abdul Halim, who had to do with politics in his hand, "he told the detikcom Yusril.
According to Yusril, the duty of a lawyer is to help people who come to him without distinction. It is expected that if the alleged infringement does not require extending upward for all.

"Will there be other costs, the future," he said when asked if he would be linked to the insistence of the Panji attack.

Not logged in fear of NII? "The law can not be mixed with politics. If someone does me the links no problem because I work in a professional manner beginning. This bill government policy, its citizens is not a crime. We must be proportional show. If their rights are respected, as expected, the presumption of innocence Azas "said Yusril.

Under the banner of a family approach to invoke a ruling class of 3 days. During this period he met the family and have found no flag. But he continued to monitor the health status yesterday, said his client that his heart was so bad I can not do research in the national police headquarters to participate.

"It's better now and that next week, once again, is ready to be explored," he said.

Banner is designated as a suspected case of forgery. Banner is approximately 263 and 266 of the forged letter KUHP. NII agreed Imam Supriyanto former minister, believes that the withdrawal of his letter is to report a false signature.

The policy will also check to satisfy the imagination of the imagination into the air. With the idea of ​​crime, counterfeiting, Panji Gumilang threatened with imprisonment of 7-8 years.

In this case, politics stops Ponpes professionals Al Zeitun, Abdul Halim, the July 5, 2011. Performed for 20 days in detention.

Sabtu, 01 Oktober 2011

Legal Compliance Crisis in Indonesia

Legal culture is closely linked with the legal awareness and behavior is realized in the form of law as a mirror of society. In the legal culture is a tradition that every day can be seen in public behavior that is consistent and reflects the will of the law or the established guidelines of the Act applies to all subjects of the law in the life of the nation and the state. In the legal culture of the society can also be seen as our society is in serious legal consciousness upheld the law as a rule of life together and as a basis for problems resulting from the risks of living together to solve.

However, looking at the material in the evidence in the criminal law has always adhered to the truth that in fact happens is this thing called the truth of the matter, it was very difficult for a culture of the law to build in this country, suggesting that real knowledge of the law alone is not sufficient to promote a culture of rights in this country to build, because the legal conscience of the community remains an abstraction, not a true form of behavior, even though our society is instinctively and rationally informed about the necessity of obedience and respect for the law.

Legal experts Prof. Sociology Satjipto Raharjo, in his book "The other side of the law in Indonesia, Compass Publishing, 2003," implicitly concluded that, in the sense of innocence, even if the decision Judex faction (PN and PT), has been convicted question is a bad precedent for the establishment of the legal culture in this country. "Critical view of sociology, the law should reflect us, because it is a profound message in the culture mentradisikan legal necessity in this country, because the law is impossible without a comprehensive culture of a law can be enforced.

Therefore, although we are aware of the laws of the country, our society is not necessarily conform to the law. Obeying the law may be important in building the legal culture in this country, and if it is actually the legal requirements?.

Law enforcement is aware of the legal benefits that the form of "loyalty" to the values ​​of the legislation in force in life have made with the attitude expressed in the form of effective enforcement of the values ​​that the law can be seen and to hear the other members of the public.

Authors should emphasize again that the rule is essentially a public awareness and loyalty to the applicable law, as a rule (rule of the game) as a result of coexistence, that faith expresses itself in terms of behavior really have respect for the law ( in particular pushover das das Sein, in fact the same).

Unlike a person in the community, if we find that many people do not obey this law because the individual and society are faced with two processes where the wedding between the demands of loyalty to each other in conflict with the demands of loyalty. Thus, people are confronted with the choice of the faithful or unfaithful to the law against "private interests", the faithful and obedient to superiors who ordered the war and kill or be faithful to his conscience say that killing is not good, or more generally, as often people do not obey traffic laws, corruption, acts of lawlessness and vigilantism (Private rights tax) because they are more loyal to self-interest or group, etc. to prioritize.

Moreover, in today's society more and more daring self-interest, without application of the law because they have more authority, where the police because of their personal interests are no longer good law, experienced discriminatory application. So in this case, the loyalty of their personal interests based on a human or decrease, because our society does not comply with the law.

If the loyalty factor can not be invoked to enforce the law, the state or the government wants to build and the public fear as a factor that makes people obey the law. The judicial authority will be felt if we have a solid, consistent and continue to enforce the law without discrimination, a person is subject to the law, the observance of the law not only partial to anyone for any reason whatsoever, exception of truth and justice itself. Herein lies the dignity of law and legal justice.

But if the law is applied in a discriminatory manner, full of political engineering, not to trust more as a means to fight for justice and righteousness, then do not blame people if they fight for their rights through legislation or violence jungle or physical violence (Private rights tax). In fact, much of Indonesia today had a crisis of law enforcement because the law has lost the essence of his purpose, and public opinion have buadaya law applies in one. Discriminatory and impartial to the specific interests of the rich and powerful Quo Vadis Law enforcement in Indonesia ...?